Written By: Bryant Frazer, Studio Daily

Is Transparent set to be the first breakout hit for Amazon Studios? The new show, created by Six Feet Under and United States of Tara veteran Jill Soloway, generated an enormous amount of buzz in advance of its premiere, 10 episodes at once, on Amazon Instant Video this Friday. The show stars Jeffrey Tambor as a family patriarch who, in the series pilot, announces to his children (Gaby Hoffman, Jay Duplass, and Amy Landecker) that he is transitioning from male to female — from Mort to Maura. The series weaves together multiple story threads following Maura and other members of the family as they deal with this disclosure, and makes liberal use of flashbacks to fill in the narrative. But pre-release publicity has focused on the show’s quality as much as its subject matter. The New York Post ran a headline calling Maura the role of Tambor’s career, and television critic Alan Sepinwall wrote that Transparent is “the best new TV show debuting anywhere this fall, by a long stretch.”

Soloway’s vision for the show is bolstered by her collaboration with cinematographer Jim Frohna and colorist Corinne Bogdanowicz, both of whom she worked with on her 2013 feature film, Afternoon Delight, which won the Directing Award at the Sundance Film Festival. Light Iron provided an Outpost mobile dailies system for the production, and the 4K DI has been executed by Bogdanowicz at Light Iron in Los Angeles. On the eve of the show’s premiere, we asked Frohna and Bogdanowicz about their creative and collaborative process, and how they created a classic look that would set the tone for a very contemporary story. Watch the trailer, below, then read on for the two Q&As.

Cinematographer Jim Frohna

StudioDaily: What kind of discussions did you have with creator Jill Soloway about the look of Transparent? Did it help that the two of you had worked together previously?

Jim Frohna: Jill and I first worked together on the feature Afternoon Delight, which ended up winning the Best Director Award at Sundance 2013. We shot in a fairly naturalistic style on the feature and wanted to push further with Transparent, both in the look and the feeling. I tend to light for the space and not just the actors, and typically through the windows. Furthermore, we rarely give the actors marks to hit. For both Jill and me, it’s worth giving the actors the space, to not clutter it up with gear. This means the actors can use the whole room and, I, as the camera operator, can follow them anywhere. It’s a freeing way to shoot and feeds right into the main goal of having things feel as authentic and real as possible. As far as inspirations, we looked to the films of John Cassavetes and also to the work and emotional exploration of the late choreographer Pina Bausch.

What camera did you shoot the pilot with, and how did you select the C500 for the series?

On the pilot we shot with the ARRI Alexa, which had been my camera of choice for all my work. But for more intimate scenes, we opted for the Canon EOS C300, again bearing in mind the goal that the machine of filmmaking be as low-profile and unobtrusive as possible. I cradled the C300 in my hands and pulled my own focus. Jill loved the look of these scenes in particular, as did I.

As we began to prep for the series, Amazon Studios announced that all shows had to be shot 4K. I knew the EOS C500 was an option, but I still decided to test the Canon vs the [Red] Epic and the [Sony] F55. The test only confirmed what my gut and eye already knew– the C500 had a cinematic look to it — the way it interprets colors is what reminds me of Fuji motion picture film — and was the right way to go for Transparent.

The other significant reason for the C500 was size. I shoot almost all handheld and wanted the lightness and flexibility of a lower-profile camera. We had three camera bodies, two in studio mode and the third in a bare-bones stripped-down mode, which we dubbed the “Intima-C Cam.” I would often grab that camera in between takes and shoot some cutaways, or I’d catch an actor, unaware that I was rolling, in a particular pose or compelling, quiet moment. The small size of the C500 made grabbing those moments possible — and those extra images or character moments, more often than not, ended up in the final cut of a scene.

What kind of challenges does shooting 4K pose? Does it make you extra-picky about lenses? And did it inspire a different approach to filtering?

As with any digital workflow, there are certain challenges, little gremlins that pop up to mess with you. We learned a lot in the first week of shooting — things like how often the camera needs to cool down before the fans kick in. Or the need to double-check the external recorder, which has no obvious indicator that it’s running. Or how to best rig all the batteries, external recorder, etc for the kind of freeform, 360-degree handheld style of shooting that I do, often for 20-minute takes or longer. Perhaps one of the bigger challenges in the overall workflow was the size of the 4K files. It’s an adjustment that has to be made in terms of hard-drive space as well as in post, working with the big files.

The fun for me, as 4K continues its march forth,  is learning and playing around with the new technology, where the limits are and what possibilities are now out there. This was especially true with the C500 — learning how it reads colors and light and, particularly, how far you can push the image in low light. The sensitivity and resolution of this camera is amazing. For example, I typically shot night scenes or driving scenes at 2500 ISO and the image, instead of falling apart with digital noise, actually acquired a texture that reminded me of film grain, and it looked great. There was one night driving scene down Sunset Boulevard that we shot at 4000 ISO and, while the image held up, you could see way too much. There were no blacks, no true shadows, and it looked like some surreal neon dreamscape.

As far as lensing, both on this project as well as other narrative and commercial work, I’ve been more and more drawn to using older lenses to bring a little character, some texture, into what can be a very pristine image. Between the older lenses and the fact that we shot many scenes at a 2.0 and a bunch wide open at 1.3, the look felt very cinematic and very far from that potentially clinical digital look. I don’t use filters, outside of ND and a Pola, as part of my “keeping things real” approach.

Light Iron tells me you used their Outpost on-set system for dailies. Can you explain a little bit about that workflow, particularly anything unusual from your perspective?

Honestly I was so caught up in shooting/operating that I put total faith in Peter Brunet, our DIT, and the Outpost system. I had conversations with him at the start, and then trusted all was well unless told otherwise. It was smooth sailing throughout the shoot.

Talk about working with colorist Corinne Bogdanowicz on the 4K DI.

I first worked with Light Iron and Corinne on Afternoon Delight and Corinne did a great job. She’s very low-key and really knows her stuff, and she’s also fast, which this time around we needed for the insanely fast post schedule on Transparent (we wrapped photography on Aug 8 and the full series launches Sept 26). The pilot was done at Keep Me Posted, but for the series, Jill and I made a push for Light Iron. Not only because of the love you feel from the whole team, including [Light Iron executive producer] Emily Eddey, but also because I knew Light Iron was pretty much at the forefront of 4K post and had done extensive work with projects shot on the C500. It was another fantastic experience. Corinne and Emily handled all our post needs, under crazy time pressure, with grace and professionalism. And the show looks really great.

How much of your look was realized in camera, and how much was finessed in post? Were there any challenging shots or scenes that really came alive in the color grade?

In the overall look, I shoot and light in a straightforward naturalistic way and thus I am shaping the look on set and in camera. However, there was one significant creative challenge for the series, which was defining a look for the many flashback scenes that are sprinkled throughout the first season. The show is a contemporary show and the flashbacks are from the late 1980s and early ’90s, which is not that long ago, really. It’s not like we’re back in the Kodachrome ’50s, to give one fairly cliched example. Rather than try to define what imagery, photography or video might have looked like back then, Jill and I ended up talked a lot about creating the feeling of memory, which led us toward a sort of faded, desaturated, look that would work well in contrast to the rest of the show. Corinne really understood and embraced the challenge and helped us define what I think is a particularly unique, not-quite-done-before style of flashbacks.

As a cinematographer, do you always manage to be closely involved with the final color grade on a project?

I will always want to be closely involved with final color. I actively advocate for myself and other DPs to have final color as part of our contracts and to have the producers budget that into the deal. It is, after all, a critical and essential part of the creative process. It’s the last push before your baby enters the world.

Colorist Corinne Bogdanowicz
StudioDaily: What was the collaborative process like? What kind of discussions did you have about the look of Transparent, and did it help that you had worked together as a team previously?

Corinne Bogdanowicz: It definitely helped that Jill and Jim and I had worked together previously. I understood their style, so we were able to quickly establish the look of the show.  Jill and Jim wanted Transparent to feel more like an independent movie than a TV show – with a slightly desaturated, muted, cool look. The look changes a bit as the story develops, with some happier moments having more warmth and color. Jim and I spent time on each episode setting the look for each scene, then Jill would come in and give notes for a final color pass.

Can you describe a scene or two that got extra attention or really came alive in the color grade?

Transparent has quite a few flashback scenes. To contrast the present-day look that was cool and hazy, we developed a slightly warmer desaturated look for the flashback scenes. One episode takes place entirely in the past, so we further developed some really beautiful unique looks for the different locations within the flashback.

Beyond the obvious presence of more pixels in the final deliverable, what kinds of challenges are posed by working with material for 4K delivery? Was there anything unusual or unique about the workflow on Transparent?

The color-correction aspect of working in 4K for us is not much different than working in 2k or HD. Our system treats the footage the same regardless of resolution. The biggest difference working in 4K is in the deliverables. It does take a little longer to create a 4K deliverable, and we also have to create HD deliverables as well.

Talk about the hardware and software you use. What’s in your color suite, and what do you like best about your toolset?

We used Quantel’s Pablo system for color-correction and conform.  Having the conform and color in one system is a huge advantage because we have the flexibility of coloring separate elements of shots that have dissolves or composites within the program. The program also handles 4K really well so we never have to use proxies in a lower resolution.

How different are 4K camera options? As a colorist, can you tell what brand of camera captured a given image just from the character of the picture?

Each digital camera does have different color properties. I can usually tell which camera is which from the image and how it responds to color, but there is a lot of variation in how the image was captured. I think each camera can look good or bad, and it mostly depends on how it was shot, and then what you do with it in post. The Canon C500 was a good choice for Transparentbecause it captured a great range and resolution, and in Jim’s hands it made some really beautiful images.

You have a degree in graphic arts, and you were a digital painter and compositor before you became a colorist. How did you make that transition, and do you find that your background in graphic arts and VFX makes you a better colorist?

I transitioned from a compositor to an assistant colorist, and then to a colorist.  I do find that my background in VFX is an advantage when coloring. There are a lot of aspects of DI that cross over with VFX, like roto, compositing, and beauty work. I’ve never been afraid to push the limits of color with power windows and layers.